Intersectionality; Why Individualism is Better
There is a lot of talk recently about how important Intersectionality is; This idea that we have overlapping oppressed identities that should be considered when being addressed.
Intersectionality fails to account for the individual while
collectivizing everyone to arbitrarily picked group identities. Collectivizing
people to group identities neglects the fact that even within like groups,
there are still difference between individuals of the group. Take for example,
a group of white people; Even though they share the same skin identity, these
individuals could differ drastically in a vast number of other ways. Politically,
religiously, etc...
Another problem with intersectionality is who is deciding
the identities we should collectives people to? More worrisome, who is deciding
which identities are more valuable? Why is it important we collectives people
by their race, socioeconomic status, sex to begin with? Why is it that we break
down our identities to see ways in which we are victims? It’s almost as though
there is this competition, and the most victimized wins the gold in the
“Oppression Olympics”.
When breaking down one’s identity using intersectionality,
the conundrum one faces is you inevitably run into individualism the more you
break down one’s identity. No two people are the same, you will always have
individuals with all differing identities. We’ve all been oppressed in some way
or another, but by simply belonging to a group doesn’t then automatically grant
you victim hood. So why bother with intersectionality?
Comments
Post a Comment